The minimum cover for HDPE pipe is 1'-0" for H-20 traffic loads if
installed in accordance with AASHTO Section 30. This is based on empirical
calculation of load response, manufacturer's testing and field experience with
the pipe. AASHTO specifications Section 18.4.1.5 defines the minimum cover as
"ID/8 but not less than 12 inches." This cover is measured from the
pipe OD to the top of a rigid (concrete) pavement or the bottom of a flexible
(bituminous) pavement. Both AASHTO and ASTM, as well as most manufacturers,
require additional (temporary) cover for construction loads greater than H-20.
Generally, an additional 2' of temporary cover, mounded over the pipe and
removed for final grading and paving, is sufficient for large construction
vehicle loads.
No. Many native soils are well suited for backfill provided they are
compacted properly. These soils meeting the unified soil classifications of a
GW, GP, SW, SP (ASTM D-2321 Class II) and GM, GC, SM, SC (ASTM D-2321 Class
III)
HDPE pipe is generally less expensive in initial material cost than RCP
and less expensive or the same cost as CMP, but the real savings are realized
in installed costs. Due to the light weight, longer lay lengths, ease of
handling, and push-together joints of ADS pipe, the installed cost savings of
HDPE ranges from 10 to 30% when compared to RCP and CMP.
When specifying pipe, the crush strength is a term used for pipes that
experience a brittle failure. In other words, the crush strength is the load at
which the pipe physically breaks. This is not applicable to a viscoelastic
material such as HDPE or an elastic material such as CMP since the material
will deflect under load to the point of failure. A HDPE pipe profile can
actually deflect until the material is flattened due to reverse curvature.
Therefore, an analogous test to crush strength for HDPE pipes would be AASHTO's
pipe flattening test, which requires the pipe be deflected 20% with no signs of
wall buckling, cracking, splitting, or delamination at a specified pipe stiffness.
NOTE: Refer to ADS Technical Note 2.01: Minimum and Maximum Burial Depth
for Corrugated HDPE Pipe.
Greater fill heights for all pipes are possible provided attention is
given to backfill materials and compaction. Research studies have successfully
installed both single wall and N-12 pipe in cover heights of 100 feet. For
fills exceeding ADS recommendations, contact an ADS representative to review
site specific data.
HDPE pipe manufactured to meet the specifications of AASHTO M-252 or
M-294 require virgin compounds be used for the manufacturing process. However,
the specifications do permit reclaimed material from the manufacturing process
to be utilized since this is virgin material that was wasted during start-up or
trimmed from the pipe. The properties of the resin are therefore known and meet
the requirements for the virgin material.
There are several methods of connecting dissimilar materials either from
ADS or outside companies. The most common method is to butt the two pipes
together, wrap the joint with a non-woven geotextile material, and pour a
concrete collar around the connection. ADS also offers a spigot adapter that
consists of a HDPE cylinder that is welded to the pipe and then slipped into
the bell end of the existing pipe. Then, depending on the joint location and
performance requirements, a geotextile wrap and/or concrete collar can be
employed. Additionally, ADS offers a watertight repair coupler that is wrapped
around the joint and tightened with a mechanical coupler. The watertight repair
coupler is most effective when used with pipes of similar outside diameters.
For additional details on field connections, contact your local ADS
representative.
HDPE meeting AASHTO M-252 or M-294 is manufactured with a carbon black
coloration that protects the material from UV degradation. Carbon black has
been proven to protect exposed HDPE pipe for over three years with no change in
tensile properties from UV effects. Once installed, the earth cover protects
the pipe from UV effects. Exposed ends of pipes are located in areas of little
or no tensile stress (due to no overburden), and therefore not a consideration
for UV effects.
Let's address these questions individually.
Sunlight contains ultra-violet rays that reduce the tensile properties
of plastics with time. HDPE pipe installed in the ground is primarily in
compression due to the annular profile design of the pipe. Slight tensile
stresses in the pipe arising from trench anomalies and residual stresses from
the manufacturing process are overcome by the large compressive stresses due to
the soil overburden. Therefore, the net stress in the pipe is compressive.
Additionally, once the pipe is backfilled it is protected from the effects of
UV rays. The pipe's exposed ends are in areas of little or no stress and
therefore a reduction in tensile strength due to UV does not affect the pipe's
performance. AASHTO and ASTM specifications include requirements of coloration
of HDPE pipes with carbon black to inhibit the effects of UV of the material.
Carbon black has been proven to protect HDPE pipe for over three years with no
change in tensile properties from UV effects. Therefore, when the pipe is
stored prior to installation, the carbon black coloration inhibits the effects
of UV rays and, once the pipe is installed, it is protected from UV by the
backfill materials and exposed ends are located in an area of little or no
stress. To illustrate the fact that carbon black protects HDPE from UV
degradation, consider the insulation coating on overhead telephone and electric
lines. These lines are insulated with HDPE that is continuously exposed.
However, since the lines are under relatively low stress, the carbon black
coloration protects the lines from UV degradation.
The effects of gasoline and whether the pipe burn will be addressed
together since the concern with fuel spills is the potential for a catastrophe,
which could damage the pipe. Gasoline does not adversely affect HDPE. The
material does not soften or lose strength when exposed to gasoline; however the
material will burn if exposed to an outside fuel source (gasoline). When
examining the effects of a catastrophic event, one needs to consider the
performance of other materials as well as the effects of the event itself. In
the case of a fuel spill and a fire in a closed storm drain system, the fire
would extinguish itself rather quickly due to an inadequate air supply. Studies
have shown that even in an open culvert the fire extinguishes itself within the
first few feet of the culvert. Repairs would be relatively simple and involve
excavating the ends of the pipe and cutting off the damaged section. This could
then be replaced with new pipe.
The Florida DOT conducted a study into the potential damage to HDPE
pipes from fire and concluded the risk of a fire was minimal and headwalls
would effectively eliminate damage. For a catastrophic event, many commonly
used materials would be damaged and require repairs. For example, asphalt
pavements would burn, metal pipes (especially asphalt coated) would be damaged
and concrete pipes would be weakened due to cracks from expanding aggregate.
Therefore, fire has the potential to damage a number of common construction
materials. When evaluated from the risk potential of damage, HDPE pipe is no
more susceptible to fire damage than other pipe materials.